Think.

The original game sold… what? 7.6 million copies. All 7.6 million people that bought that game were seriously *navi*ed off about the fact that the Triforce could not be found. Complaints were issued. Many asked the Shigster himself. Some compiled glitches that could lead to it. There was even a successful GameShark code that allowed you to find it. But, no in-game Triforce. If the Triforce was actually put in… sales would be off the chart. Shigeru Miyamoto would crap his pants.

Jumanji_Shishioh said:

Eternal Legend said:

Meh, I’ve already got it on the VC, as well as a by-now-defunct one on the N64, so I wouldn’t buy it, but it’s an interesting notion, something I also thought of.

However, without the analog control, it wouldn’t really feel the same, especially the first-person parts (bow, hookshot etc.). It worked in Metroid Prime: Hunters, but only because that game focused solely on that aspect, it wouldn’t really work as a mix of the two, as opposed to console games with analog controls. Then again, it could technically work, but would be really stiff, and not really enjoyable. It’d also be missing two C-items, due to the limited buttons (unless navi and FP view would move onto the select button, but then how would we control the mini-map? *sigh*)

But yeah, it’s an interesting aspect, and I might consider it if they added some decent extra material, but it’s nothing I’d jump of joy over. But to put it bluntly, I’d rather they’d focus on making new games, instead of wasting possible development time on a re-make.

Have you played Phantom Hourglass?

Well, Phantom Hourglass felt much more like a 2-d game with 3-d graphics and much more directions than teh usual 8. Oh, and some height. However, as I said, the first-person aspect of OoT wouldn’t really carry over that well, and Phantom Hourglass decided to completely leave that out, just using the bow etc. from an above perspective.

Eternal Legend said:

Meh, I’ve already got it on the VC, as well as a by-now-defunct one on the N64, so I wouldn’t buy it, but it’s an interesting notion, something I also thought of.

However, without the analog control, it wouldn’t really feel the same, especially the first-person parts (bow, hookshot etc.). It worked in Metroid Prime: Hunters, but only because that game focused solely on that aspect, it wouldn’t really work as a mix of the two, as opposed to console games with analog controls. Then again, it could technically work, but would be really stiff, and not really enjoyable. It’d also be missing two C-items, due to the limited buttons (unless navi and FP view would move onto the select button, but then how would we control the mini-map? *sigh*)

But yeah, it’s an interesting aspect, and I might consider it if they added some decent extra material, but it’s nothing I’d jump of joy over. But to put it bluntly, I’d rather they’d focus on making new games, instead of wasting possible development time on a re-make.

Have you played Phantom Hourglass?

However, without the analog control, it wouldn’t really feel the same, especially the first-person parts (bow, hookshot etc.). It worked in Metroid Prime: Hunters, but only because that game focused solely on that aspect, it wouldn’t really work as a mix of the two, as opposed to console games with analog controls. Then again, it could technically work, but would be really stiff, and not really enjoyable. It’d also be missing two C-items, due to the limited buttons (unless navi and FP view would move onto the select button, but then how would we control the mini-map? *sigh*)

But yeah, it’s an interesting aspect, and I might consider it if they added some decent extra material, but it’s nothing I’d jump of joy over. But to put it bluntly, I’d rather they’d focus on making new games, instead of wasting possible development time on a re-make.